First Glance
Love it or hate it, the CTS is part of a family of boldly styled vehicles. With sharp edges and flat planes, the Cadillac design palette barely has a curve. I can't tell the STS and CTS apart at a distance the CTS looks like a 3/4 scale model of the bigger sedan. Like the STS and the rest of the Cadillac line, the CTS looks like it was sculpted with a scalpel. I'm not sure yet if that's good or bad ask me in five years. The real iconic Cadillacs have always been extreme designs, though. Remember the big fins of the late 1950's, and the long hoods on the Eldorados of the late 60's? You don't drive a Cadillac to blend in with the crowd, and you won't be overlooked in a CTS.Fit and finish are above average for GM products, but still not up to BMW/Mercedes/Lexus standards. My test CTS was finished in an optional ($995) premium paint color, "Infrared." I think the CTS looks better in "Raven Black" or "Light Platinum," so I would save the extra grand for a new suit so I could look good next to my Caddy.
There's no sign on the exterior of the CTS that you've chosen the 3.6L V6 over the less expensive 2.8L V6 model. But there is a big Cadillac emblem on the grille and on the trunk, so you neighbors will know what you're driving.
In the Driver's Seat

The CTS's gauge package is clear and uncluttered, shaded by an eyebrow above the steering wheel. The center stack in my test CTS was occupied by the $2,995 DVD Navigation System, 6 CD Changer/AM/FM/XM Radio. The screen is excellent, and the navigation system is superb, but yikes! Nearly three thousand dollars!
My test car was plagued by rattles and shakes in the dash and console. The shift selector knob was so ill-fitting that it felt like it was going to come off in my hand every time I chose a gear. I couldn't figure out how to tighten it. The dashboard had a mix of textures and materials a peculiar cross-hatched plastic dominated, and I didn't like it. I think it's supposed to be "sporty," but its out of place in a luxury car. It looks like a nightmare to keep clean.
On The Road
I was worried that the CTS's V6 wouldn't thrill me after all, last year I drove the CTS-V, which has a soul-stirring 6.0 liter V8 under the hood that pounds out 400 hp and 395 lb-ft of torque yee-ha! I needn't have worried. The 3.6 liter V6 produces 255 hp and 252 lb-ft of torque, which turned out to be plenty for spirited driving around town and on the highway. My big complaint with the CTS-V was the heaviness of the clutch on the 6-speed manual transmission. My CTS was equipped with the optional ($1,200) 5-speed automatic transmission, which made driving in our heavy Los Angeles traffic way more pleasant.When I needed the power, the V6 roared to life, zooming up freeway onramps and keeping me ahead in the stoplight derby. The EPA estimates that the CTS will deliver 18 mpg in the city and 27 mpg on the highway, which is pretty good for the performance. Rear-wheel drive is a good setup for this car, but the suspension is too soft to inspire confidence around the curves. The CTS is more cruiser than bruiser.
My passengers weren't thrilled with the back seat. They complained about leg and head room. If you need to carry kids in a car seat, you'd better be limber, because it's a tight squeeze with the low roofline.
Journey's End

Mercedes' C-class, Acura's TL and Lexus' IS 350 are all in the hunt as well, with great rides and luxury features that rival the BMW in many respects. You might also wish to consider the Chrysler 300, which is another audaciously styled American car. My personal favorite in the class is the Infiniti G35 Sedan, which totally rocks my world.
In the CTS lineup, the 3.6 Liter V6 is engine setup I'd choose it's more expensive than the 2.8 Liter V6, but better mated to the car. I wouldn't bother with the CTS-V as outrageous and fun as it can be, it's too hard to live with on a daily basis.
If your name is on a parking space at work, the CTS will let everyone know that you're there to play your "A" game. Until you get that Porsche...





