1. Autos

Discuss in my forum

2008 Kia Rondo

About.com Rating 2.5 Star Rating
User Rating 5 Star Rating (1 Review) Write a review

By , About.com Guide

2008 Kia Rondo left-front view

Kia Rondo has several strong points; styling isn't one of them

Photo © Kia

The Bottom Line

What do the About.com Rating stars mean?

The idea behind the Kia Rondo is to combine the practicality of an SUV with the look and feel of a car. And the Rondo does it, sort of, with seven seats and a profile that is, in its own awkward way, more reminiscent of a car than an SUV. So how does the Rondo work in the real world? Read on.

Larger photos: Front - rear - interior - all photos

Pros

  • Low price
  • Lots of seating space and storage areas
  • All safety features come standard

Cons

  • Using all seats leaves little cargo room
  • Awkward styling
  • Mediocre fuel economy

Description

  • Rondo blurs the line between car, minivan and crossover utility vehicle
  • Price range: $17,395 - $25,505
  • Price as tested: $23,895
  • EPA fuel economy estimates: 19 MPG city/26 highway (4-cylinder), 18/26 (V6)

Guide Review - 2008 Kia Rondo

There are a few things I really like about the Rondo. I think the interior (link goes to photo) is nicely done, with attractive, high-quality materials. (Several folks who rode in the car disagreed with me. But what do they know? I'm the journalist!) I like that adults can occupy the third row without having to slide the second-row seats forward. And I like the price -- the $17,395 base model includes an automatic transmission, electronic stability control, and a CD player, though if you want air conditioning you'll have to pay another $1,500 for the Rondo LX.

Here's the problem: The Mazda5 does almost everything better. The Mazda5 provides decent cargo room with all three rows of seats in use. The Rondo's cargo bay barely has room for a few grocery bags unless you fold down the rear seat. The Mazda's four-cylinder engine yields better acceleration and fuel economy than the Rondo's V6. (The 4-cylinder Rondo is slower but almost as thirsty as the V6.) The Mazda5's sliding rear doors are more convenient than the Rondo's traditional hinged doors. And the Mazda looks like better -- the Rondo appears to have been styled by two different groups of people who apparently don't like each other very much.

It's not an outright victory for the Mazda, though. The Rondo seats seven versus the Mazda's six, and the Mazda's two-seat middle row means you can't put a child seat in the center position; you can with the Rondo. I think the Kia's interior is way nicer than the Mazda's. And the Kia's value is hard to beat: Feature-for-feature it's $800 to $1,000 cheaper than the Mazda5, plus it gets standard electronic stability control, which the Mazda5 doesn't even offer. The Rondo is a good solution for a large family on a tight budget . But if you can swing the cost of a minivan -- Kia's own Sedona starts under $22k -- you'd be better off. -- Aaron Gold

User Reviews

 5 out of 5
KIA Rondo 2010 - It is a winner, Member tsmvp

I was shopping for a daily beater that could carry the family (wife and two kids 14 and 10, one being 6'4"") and be flexible enough to carry more people when needed. After test driving several cars from several manufacturers, the Rondo beat all of them, hands down. I got the 2010 EX V6 Luxury with Navi and it has pretty much everything the Mazda 5 has but at a much lower cost. Just the Navi on the Mazda is a $2,600 option vs $1,000 on the Rondo. The list goes on. Add to that a 5-year/100,000km bumper to bumper warranty and roadside assistance and you cannot beat the value. Just to give you an idea of pricing the fully loaded Rondo comes at $32,900 (CAD) vs. $35,800 for the Mazda 5 (all taxes in, 2010 vehicles with similar options like Navigation, Fog lights, etc). That is a $3,000 difference. If you add the Mazda extra warranty to match the KIA one, you are in the $5,000 range difference. Considering both vehicles will probably have very similar resale prices after 7, 8 years, the extra $5,000 is simply not worth IMHO. Sure in the past KIA/Hyundai had reliability issues. Exactly like Honda/Toyota/Subaru 25 years ago when trying to break into the North American market. Things changed a lot. As an example, as of today the highest rated car at Consumer Reports is the Hyundai Genesis, at 92 points out of 100. The Rondo is by far the smoothest and quietest car I have ever purchased (note: I have two other cars, a 2006 Porsche Cayenne and a 2008 Jeep Patriot, both loaded with all you can get). Sure both have AWD or 4×4 but again, much noisier, not as good on gas (the Porsche is a joke at 16L/100km) and cost more (Cayenne, 3 times more). On the fuel economy, I am currently getting 12L/100km on the city and under 10L/100Km on the highway. I did notice the mileage is getting better every day (the car has now 1600km on it) but do not expect scooter mileage ratings from a car with a V6! For anyone considering a new car, take a look at KIA. It will not only impress you (the fit and finish on the Rondo is WAY above average for this class) but it will save you a TON of money when compared to anything similar from vendors like Honda, Toyota, Nissan and Mazda.

Write a review

31 out of 32 people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes | No

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.